Nissan 240SX Forums banner

tears for 240's

4.3K views 70 replies 35 participants last post by  240SXAddict  
#1 ·
i feel sorry for you guys, whats wit the KA!!??

ive been looking at this board for awhille and it seems to me that you guys are missing an important question.. its like everyones ingnoring the elephant in the room.

why does this motor make such poor numbers, especially with an intake cam and headers+exhaust??

i see alott of you talking about porting and polishing the head and not reaching a measly 200hp! there has to be a HUGE problem with headflow somewhere. when a massive increase in the breathing abilities of a motor doesnt translate into a huge increase in volumetric efficiency theres a REASON! im not a nissan expert but dumping near 1000 dollars into breathing ability without results means your missing something.

one thing ive noticed in the 240 world is that you guys dont pay that much attention to engine management. you all go nuts when i say that but coming from the f-body world, the general consensus is that a modded car without tuning is SLOWER. doesnt matter what you did to your car, cams intake whatever, anything that increases breathing without a corresponding increase in fueling means little to no power gain. an air filter does not increase efficiency enough that the computer cant compensate however anything deeper then that and your ecm might not keep up.

also these fuel computers that are common in this world are bandaid fixes at best, when you, in effect, lie to your ecm you're making things more complicated, and you will still be limited by the factory settings. custom tuning an ecm is the best way to go by far. KA-T.org has a great forum on this and nissan guys are just starting to tap the resource that f-body guys have used for a couple of years now, TUNERPRO, one of the finest tuning programs around. the program is free by the way, and the guy that created it is starting to get into nissan ECM's. there is also a tool thats been around for a few years called a prominator that allows you to tune your factory ecm in real time while the car is running WITH datalogging. tunerproRT even supports the prominator, look up the name mark mansur on google to find out more. i think the prominator runs for bout 500 dollars, i have yet to figure out how companies like AEM Greddy and HKS keep ripping off the import community, the stock ecms can be modded to do the same thing as a standalone for nearl 50% less cash.

theres no reason a bigger KA24 cant wipe the floor with the SR(KA has 25% more displacement, you think a stock turbo makes up for that?
). theres something thats not adding up here, find it and im betting you will find alott more power. also, yeah the sr is turbo, so what, it still puts out round 225 whp at best(stock). that's actually kind of puny considering how much people pay for the things. im betting that if you find your hold up which has to be in the head or in the fueling/timing you guys will be smoking SR swaps with 1500 invested in a KA. THINK!
 
#2 ·
forgot to mention,, this all applies to naturally aspirated motors, turbo motors bypass poor headflow with boost
 
#3 ·
lol :gaylaugh edit your first post and say it was a mistake and same with the second and hope that i was the only one who saw this. do it know and ill keep my mouth shut


KA's better than SR's with only 1500$ invested
:rotflmao :gaylaugh :rotflmao :gaylaugh :rotflmao :gaylaugh
 
#5 ·
i dont get it, so many people hate on the ka when it's been proven that the ka can be a damn good engine. i would personally build a ka over an sr because of the fact that you dont have to use money to buy the motor to start with. with the ka, your motor's already there, all you have to do is get it turbo'd. and i know there has been a ka that's been boosted up to 50lbs on stock internals. or atleast somewhere near there. have you ever heard of an sr being boosted that high on stock internals? i doubt it...
 
#8 ·
hm.. i have an sr and i must say i think the ka has alot of potential but for the cost its not worth it. the only thing i regret about my sr is NO TOURQUE unless in boost!! i miss that of the ka and also stupid issues the sr has. My ka never had nearly as many problems but hey when you find out how to bring the beast out of the ka let me know. i'd come back
 
#9 ·
you do know there has been a $800 200HP KA thread on freshalloy for a LOOOOONG time right? I've linked it here mulitple times... and they did no internals at all...

of course you can smoke a stock turbo SR with an NA KA...
 
#12 ·
by tougher i mean a stronger motor
 
#13 ·
a 65 horsepower increase for under 1000 doesn't sound like a bad deal to me. if you really think about it the ka has about 130-135 to the wheels. people who ae putting up 200 horsepower numbers for around a g are getting that to the wheels.
 
#14 ·
the SR swap doesnt cost that much. and whats this about ripping out dashes nshit and swapping ecu's? all you do is convert your old wire harness. and my friend and I had an entire front clip with everything to run for like 2200. the only thing we changed was the clutch. I just did a Ka-t build tho and i am very pleased with the results. even at 7psi i can tell that my car pulls faster and harder than my friends SR. another thing is the SR's can rev higher (stock) which is nice. I do however, agree with you that rom tunes are far better than piggy backs. but not everyone has that luxury, time, mental capacity. why are you preaching this here? we know about our motors, thats why we are in the KA)-T section.
 
#22 ·
I understand where he is comming from i dont think that he was starting to make another sr vs ka post he was just simply stating why is it that Ka's cant make that much power without boost and if there might be some sort of problem internally.

Has any one seen the vid with the ITBs in the Ka ?
 
#23 ·
i feel sorry for you guys, whats wit the KA!!??

ive been looking at this board for awhille and it seems to me that you guys are missing an important question.. its like everyones ingnoring the elephant in the room.

why does this motor make such poor numbers, especially with an intake cam and headers+exhaust??

i see alott of you talking about porting and polishing the head and not reaching a measly 200hp! there has to be a HUGE problem with headflow somewhere. when a massive increase in the breathing abilities of a motor doesnt translate into a huge increase in volumetric efficiency theres a REASON! im not a nissan expert but dumping near 1000 dollars into breathing ability without results means your missing something.

one thing ive noticed in the 240 world is that you guys dont pay that much attention to engine management. you all go nuts when i say that but coming from the f-body world, the general consensus is that a modded car without tuning is SLOWER. doesnt matter what you did to your car, cams intake whatever, anything that increases breathing without a corresponding increase in fueling means little to no power gain. an air filter does not increase efficiency enough that the computer cant compensate however anything deeper then that and your ecm might not keep up.

also these fuel computers that are common in this world are bandaid fixes at best, when you, in effect, lie to your ecm you're making things more complicated, and you will still be limited by the factory settings. custom tuning an ecm is the best way to go by far. KA-T.org has a great forum on this and nissan guys are just starting to tap the resource that f-body guys have used for a couple of years now, TUNERPRO, one of the finest tuning programs around. the program is free by the way, and the guy that created it is starting to get into nissan ECM's. there is also a tool thats been around for a few years called a prominator that allows you to tune your factory ecm in real time while the car is running WITH datalogging. tunerproRT even supports the prominator, look up the name mark mansur on google to find out more. i think the prominator runs for bout 500 dollars, i have yet to figure out how companies like AEM Greddy and HKS keep ripping off the import community, the stock ecms can be modded to do the same thing as a standalone for nearl 50% less cash.

theres no reason a bigger KA24 cant wipe the floor with the SR(KA has 25% more displacement, you think a stock turbo makes up for that?
). theres something thats not adding up here, find it and im betting you will find alott more power. also, yeah the sr is turbo, so what, it still puts out round 225 whp at best(stock). that's actually kind of puny considering how much people pay for the things. im betting that if you find your hold up which has to be in the head or in the fueling/timing you guys will be smoking SR swaps with 1500 invested in a KA. THINK!


ya you can come over and do everything to it otherwise whats the point and stateing sumthing everyone already knows???
 
#31 ·
i feel sorry for you guys, whats wit the KA!!??

ive been looking at this board for awhille and it seems to me that you guys are missing an important question.. its like everyones ingnoring the elephant in the room.

why does this motor make such poor numbers, especially with an intake cam and headers+exhaust??

i see alott of you talking about porting and polishing the head and not reaching a measly 200hp! there has to be a HUGE problem with headflow somewhere.
problem isnt with the headflow, its just that manufacturing technologies have greatly surppase those of the older v8 days. The whole reason you port and polish is to get rid of the casting marks so it will flow better. well the KA's head flows pretty good for stock and doesnt have meny casting marks. getting oversized valves help but not by much.
 
#32 ·
i see your point however that doesnt explain the poor returns on header and intake swaps. there's got to be a bottleneck somewhere. Rb's have only a tad more displacement and run MUCH stronger(turbo i know). rb25 is damn close to the same displacement, extra cylinders simplify things but STILL there is something missing.
What limits the ka's rev ability? if its running out of air on the top end then where is that bottleneck? It's bigger (more rotating mass) so it should have slightly shorter rev range but with a girdle on the bottom end stock, i dont see why it shouldnt rev higher. Stock rev limiter is what, 5750 rpm? we run out of power long before that. Im in a pickup and with a plenumless intake my powerband is not that different, motors not taking advantage of a more open intake design, why not?