phast said:
Stock SR20DET engines do not push 18 pounds of boost. The turbo is ineffecient after 14 pounds. Also stock SR20DET engines do not have a BOV.
As for the necessary parts for a car to run 300hp I can compile the list as it's a list I've already run through in my head many times.
I'll try to compile this list later today...I'm at work right now so it's hard to play on the internet.
14 lbs, huh? i would say it's a little higher than that. i think it's more like 16-17 lbs
cost is going to be near equal for any direction you take. (rb25 can do 300 whp on stock turbo)
i would worry about a high mile KA pushing 300 whp even though there are a TON of people doing it without problems.
it all comes down to what you like. as i see it:
CA:
+ great valvetrain. rev to the moon stock. factory turbo. could handle 300 whp stock.
- 1.8 means you lack tourque down low and it will take more boost or a larger turbo to get you there.higher cylinder pressures (lower reliability) and more lag. parts are slightly harder to get than SR or ka
RB20:
+ smooth inline six. power akin to an sr.
- harder to find parts for. why not get the sr?
RB25
+ 2.5 liters of skyline power. smooth as hell. strong motor. could handle 450+ whp stock. tourque! strong valvetrain
- weight balance of car. (minor issue) higher entry cost. parts availability. (though it is improving everyday)
SR:
+ square motor. smooth as can be to redline for a four. okay up to 400whp stock. easy install. better parts availability than a civic.
- still only a 2 liter. used motrs may need rebuilds anyway. valvetrain isn't #1. (though this is never really a concern for SR owners. install a RAS and hg and you're good to go for 400 whp)
KA:
+ 2.4 liter tourque. good spool up with smaller turbos. fat tourque curve. strong valvetrain. KAs are cheap, plentiful, and available in the US. (hey just find a guy with an SR and you've probably found yourself a KA) King of domesticaly available parts- engine and otherwise.
- Head does not flow. intake manifold sucks. Rebuild suggested. (since it was not a factory turbo engine pistons, rods, etc are not quite up to par) Does not rev smoohtly.
+/- long stroke- causes the engine to rev like poo. causes turbos to spool faster. we all know the KA is not a truck motor and i'm not trying to hate, but i drive my girl's 91 de at least once a week and it defenitley has that "truck 4" quality to it. some may like this.
I'm obviously a little biased, but you get the idea.
i suggest RB25. put that thing in with McKinney kit, boost controller, turbo-back exhaust, and fmic. done. a little more money than your average turbo KA or SR swap, but enroute to 300 whp costs will even out and the RB25 has, inarguably, the best power band.
i am an SR owner and am considering selling off my SR and related parts to get an rb25 swap underway. there's a shop local to me called Carluch Motorsports that can do it for a reasonable price. they did my SR swap and did top notch work.
good luck deciding. read all the boards for at least 2-3 months before jumping into this.