Nissan 240SX Forums banner

hi-flow cat vs test pipe

9.9K views 11 replies 9 participants last post by  Fidelity101  
#1 ·
trust me ive searched the unorganized information on this site countless times without any good answers, just peoples rambling and bitching. if there is a good thread i missed point me in that direction. anyway


im about to swap a ka24de engine into my 240sx that previously had a ka24e so im replacing some things and im now to the point where i know i need a cat but heres the situation:

my car has only has about 3k on it since my last inspection so its emission exempt when i get it inspected next week which is great so i wont *NEED* a cat for atleast a year.
my car has a 3" cat back which is on the big side for a NA 4 cyclinder but ive seen dyno graphs that say it adds a few ponies up top with some lose in torque on my engine. ive heard alot of negative things about test pipes so im asking you guys your opinion on them. would it be beneficial for the time being to go with a test pipe until i have to go ahead and buy that high flow cat or should i get it now and not have to worry about it later?


ohh ya the reason for the 3" piping is that i will be FI someday soon

thanks guys!
Jimmy
 
#2 ·
i have a test pipe on my car. just make sure it's not just pipe so it at least will pass Visual inspection. mine looks like a big round cannon haha. Honestly I'd have to say go high flow cat. I will be getting one soon. I don't smell anything bad from the exhaust, I just feel bad about doing it since I drive my car everyday. High flow cat gets my vote.
 
#4 ·
It is an actual cat. It doesn't work as well as a stock cat, as in burning the unburnt fuel. I've heard someone's car before and after a high flow cat and it "sounds" like a test pipe.
 
#5 ·
My exhaust is a Hotshot header-->Catco 3in highflow cat-->3in GP sports exaust. I put the header and cat on at the same time so i can let you know there was a slight loss in torque but a nice bump in horsepower. The car sounds deep and smooth but pops a little when off throttle below 2k rpm.
 
#6 · (Edited)
as for visual inspection, my car is inspected my my dads best friend who owns a shop. my car will *always* pass emissions because of that. last year when it didnt pass, we used a ford probe as my car and PASSED emissions.

im just wondering about the specific pros and cons of a test pipe vs a hi flow cat plus i was thinking about the cost effectivness of a 20 dollar test pipe.
 
#7 ·
i went from stock cat to test pipe and it didnt seem alot louder but i do get the occaional pop when i let off around 2000 rpms. but i did notice immediatly better throttle response. i know it raised some hp #s because i have seen dynos of it on other n/a cars and it give gaines of 8 hp.also if you have ever looked inside a cat it looks like a bee hive and it looks really restrictive.
 
#8 ·
well actually you with an n/a motor a test pipe is not nessicary you dont have that much air going out the motor to actually take advantage of the pipe . it is meant for turbo motors and is meant to make much air to go out as possible . to get most gains or horsepower . yes what they had said already is that a free flow cat is a cat it takes out the un burned carbon and other stuff a normal cat does but it is not as restrictive .
thats why they are made street legal . but in youre case it would be best since you already have a 3in cat back so a free flow cat is all you need especialy if youre looking to pass emissions .
 
#11 ·
well i went ahead and bought a magnaflow OE fitment cat from pdm-racing.

my car will never have a SR in it and in reality will probably never see a turbo. my car is a daily driver first and foremost. secondly its a weeekend autox car that i like to run in a STOCK class so NA is a must. if i good good and decide to go farther into autoxing then we will see what happens!